Review of Advances in Proof-Theoretic Semantics edited by Thomas Piecha and Peter Schroeder-Heister, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (2016)

What could you mean by the term “proof-theoretic semantics” (PTS)? At first glance, it could mean either the semantics of proof theory, or perhaps it’s more likely to mean semantics conducted using the tools of proof theory. And that’s the enterprise that the fifteen authors intend to advance in the sixteen papers in this edited collection…


Do you like this, or do you have a comment? Then please  share or reply on Twitter, or  email me.


← On Priest on Nonmonotonic and Inductive Logic | Writing Archive | Existence and Definedness: the semantics of possibility and necessity →

about

I’m Greg Restall, and this is my personal website. I teach philosophy and logic as Professor of Philosophy at the University of Melbourne. ¶ Start at the home page of this site—a compendium of recent additions around here—and go from there to learn more about who I am and what I do. ¶ This is my personal site on the web. Nothing here is in any way endorsed by the University of Melbourne.

elsewhere

subscribe

To receive updates from this site, you can subscribe to the  RSS feed of all updates to the site in an RSS feed reader, or follow me on Twitter at  @consequently, where I’ll update you if anything is posted.

search