(with Robert K. Meyer) “ ‘Strenge’ Arithmetics,” Logique et Analyse 42 (1999) 205–220 (published in 2002).

 download pdf

We consider the virtues of relevant arithmetic couched in the logic E of entailment as opposed to R of relevant implication. The move to a stronger logic allows us to construct a complete system of true arithmetic, in which whenever an entailment A → B is not true (an example: 0=2 → 0=1 is not provable) then its negation ~(A → B) is true.


Do you like this, or do you have a comment? Then please  share or reply on Twitter, or  email me.


← Carnap’s Tolerance, Meaning and Logical Pluralism | Writing Archive | Logic →

about

I’m Greg Restall, and this is my personal website. I teach philosophy and logic as Professor of Philosophy at the University of Melbourne. ¶ Start at the home page of this site—a compendium of recent additions around here—and go from there to learn more about who I am and what I do. ¶ This is my personal site on the web. Nothing here is in any way endorsed by the University of Melbourne.

elsewhere

subscribe

To receive updates from this site, you can subscribe to the  RSS feed of all updates to the site in an RSS feed reader, or follow me on Twitter at  @consequently, where I’ll update you if anything is posted.

search