I don't normally spend my time worrying about the monopolistic practices of that software company, but this case is too bizarre to go unremarked. In a nutshell, at this site Microsoft explain that if a computer is donated to a school, it's a legal requirement that the original software installed on the computer be donated with it. Notice that they agree that the school can upgrade the software on the computer to another version of Windows. Why, then, should the school not accept computers which have been previously upgraded with another operating system? When is an upgrade allowed, and when is it not?
[Thanks to Rory for the pointer.]
I’m Greg Restall, and this is my personal website. I teach philosophy and logic as Professor of Philosophy at the University of Melbourne. ¶ Start at the home page of this site—a compendium of recent additions around here—and go from there to learn more about who I am and what I do. ¶ This is my personal site on the web. Nothing here is in any way endorsed by the University of Melbourne.