“Defining Double Negation Elimination,” Logic Journal of the IGPL, 8 (2000) 853–860.
In his paper Generalised Ortho Negation'' J. Michael Dunn mentions a claim of mine to the effect that there is no condition on `perp frames' equivalent to the holding of <em>double negation elimination</em> (from ~~A to infer A). That claim of mine was wrong. In this paper I correct my error and analyse the behaviour of conditions on frames for negations which verify a number of different theses. (<a href="http://www.vuw.ac.nz/phil/ed.html">Ed Mares</a> has pointed out that there’s some overlap between this paper and his earlierA Star-Free Semantics for R” (JSL 1995), which I’d read long before writing this one. The particular modelling condition for DNE is still original to me, however.)
I’m Greg Restall, and this is my website. I work in Philosophy at the University of Melbourne. Email: greg at consequently.org; Post: School of of Philosophy, Anthropology and Social Inquiry, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia.
Start at the home page—a summary of the site. The left column is news, archived on the news archive page. The central column is for photos, archived on the occasional photos page. The right column contains recent items from the writing page, which lists my publications. These are also categorised by topic. You can follow my links at my account on delicious and occasional short snarky remarks at @consequently on twitter.
To subscribe to this site, either read the full feed
of everything, the feed of news items only
, or the feed of writing items only
, which is also great for podcasting pdfs automatically.
This site is handcoded: I write text in Textmate, and Webby files things in the right place and uploads them to the server. This page was last modified on 2009-01-01 at 10:27PM.
The aim of philosophy is to understand how things in the broadest possible sense of the term hang together in the broadest possible sense of the term.
— Wilfrid Sellars “Philosophy and the Scientfic Image of Man”.