“Simplified Semantics for Relevant Logics (and some of their rivals)” Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (1993) 481–511.

 download pdf

I show how Priest and Sylvan’s simplified semantics extends from basic relevant logics to a large class of stronger logics. The completeness proof is a little tricky, given the different behaviour of the normal world in the models. This is the first paper from my Ph.D. thesis.


Do you like this, or do you have a comment? Then please  share or reply on Twitter, or  email me.


← A Note on Naïve Set Theory in LP | Writing Archive | How to be Really Contraction Free →

about

I’m Greg Restall, and this is my personal website. I teach philosophy and logic as Professor of Philosophy at the University of Melbourne. ¶ Start at the home page of this site—a compendium of recent additions around here—and go from there to learn more about who I am and what I do. ¶ This is my personal site on the web. Nothing here is in any way endorsed by the University of Melbourne.

elsewhere

subscribe

To receive updates from this site, you can subscribe to the  RSS feed of all updates to the site in an RSS feed reader, or follow me on Twitter at  @consequently, where I’ll update you if anything is posted.

search