## How to be Really Contraction Free

“How to be Really Contraction Free” Studia Logica 52 (1993) 381–391.

I show that any finitely valued logic of a simple kind fails to support naïve comprehension, if it has a conditional. I then go on to show how some infinitely valued logics also fail to be robustly contraction free. Then I make a bold conjecture that robust contraction freedom is sufficient to support naïve set theory. This conjecture was later proved to be wrong by two graduate students from Monash, Sam Buchart and Su Rogerson, in some delightful work in 1997, which has since also been published in Studia Logica.

Do you like this, or do you have a comment? Then please  share or reply on Twitter, or  email me.

← Simplified Semantics for Relevant Logics (and some of their rivals) | Writing Archive | Deviant Logic and the Paradoxes of Self-Reference →