Logical Pluralism: Meaning, Rules and Counterexamples

March 3, 2017

Abstract: I attempt to give a pluralist and syntax-independent account of classical and constructive proof, grounded in univocal rules for evaluating assertions and denials for judgments featuring the logical connectives, interpretable as governing warrants for and against claims, and which results in an interpretation of classical and constructive counterexamples to invalid arguments.

This is a talk presented at the [Pluralisms Workshop](Logical Pluralism: Meaning, Rules and Counterexamples), hosted at the University of Bonn, March 2-4, 2017.


I’m Greg Restall, and this is my personal website. I am the Shelby Cullom Davis Professor of Philosophy at the University of St Andrews, and the Director of the Arché Philosophical Research Centre for Logic, Language, Metaphysics and Epistemology I like thinking about – and helping other people think about – logic and philosophy and the many different ways they can inform each other.


To receive updates from this site, subscribe to the RSS feed in your feed reader. Alternatively, follow me at  @consequently@hcommons.social, where most updates are posted.


This site is powered by Netlify, GitHub, Hugo, Bootstrap, and coffee.   ¶   © 1992– Greg Restall.