“Generality and Existence I: Quantification and Free Logic,” Review of Symbolic Logic, 12 (2019) 1–29.

doi:10.1017/S175502031800031X

 download pdf

In this paper, I motivate a cut free sequent calculus for classical logic with first order quantification, allowing for singular terms free of existential import. Along the way, I motivate a criterion for rules designed to answer Prior’s question about what distinguishes rules for logical concepts, like ‘conjunction’ from apparently similar rules for putative concepts like ‘tonk’, and I show that the rules for the quantifiers—and the existence predicate—satisfy that condition.


Do you like this, or do you have a comment? Then please  share or reply on Twitter, or  email me.


← Negation on the Australian Plan | Writing Archive | Proofs and Models in Naive Property Theory: A Response to Hartry Field's ‚ÄúProperties, Propositions and Conditionals‚ÄĚ →

about

I’m Greg Restall, and this is my personal website. I teach philosophy and logic as Professor of Philosophy at the University of Melbourne. ¶ Start at the home page of this site—a compendium of recent additions around here—and go from there to learn more about who I am and what I do. ¶ This is my personal site on the web. Nothing here is in any way endorsed by the University of Melbourne.

elsewhere

subscribe

To receive updates from this site, you can subscribe to the  RSS feed of all updates to the site in an RSS feed reader, or follow me on Twitter at  @consequently, where I’ll update you if anything is posted.

search