“Logical Pluralism and the Preservation of Warrant,” in S. Rahman et al. (eds.) Logic, Epistemology and the Philosophy of Science, pp. 163-173, Kluwer 2004.
I defend logical pluralism against the charge that One True Logic is motivated by considerations of warrant preservation. On the way I attempt to clarify just a little the connections between deductive validity and epistemology.
You are welcome to download and read this document. I welcome feedback on it. Please check the final published version if you wish to cite it. Thanks.
I’m Greg Restall, and this is my personal website. ¶ I am the Shelby Cullom Davis Professor of Philosophy at the University of St Andrews, and the Director of the Arché Philosophical Research Centre for Logic, Language, Metaphysics and Epistemology ¶ I like thinking about – and helping other people think about – logic and philosophy and the many different ways they can inform each other.