“Simplified Semantics for Relevant Logics (and some of their rivals)” Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (1993) 481–511.

 download pdf

I show how Priest and Sylvan’s simplified semantics extends from basic relevant logics to a large class of stronger logics. The completeness proof is a little tricky, given the different behaviour of the normal world in the models. This is the first paper from my Ph.D. thesis.


Do you like this, or do you have a comment? Then please  share or reply on Twitter, or  email me.


← A Note on Naïve Set Theory in LP | Writing Archive | How to be Really Contraction Free →

about

I’m Greg Restall, and this is my personal website. ¶ I am the Shelby Cullom Davis Professor of Philosophy at the University of St Andrews.

elsewhere

subscribe

To receive updates from this site, you can subscribe to the  RSS feed of all updates to the site in an RSS feed reader, or follow me on Twitter at  @consequently, where I’ll update you if anything is posted.

search